It might also help to rethink the problem from a different angle – because a 2000-iteration loop for each pixel is a lot , even if you could access that much data. Is it possible to reorganize your problem so that you're drawing the actual circles, instead of just accessing the circle data in a sha...

What's a good way to pass a big amount of data to a shader? I'm looking at passing a table, with variable size, of circle objects. Something like: circles = {[1] = {x1, y1, r1}, [2] = {x2, y2, r2} ..., [n] = {xn, yn, rn}} I was doing with vec3 matrices, but then I have to hard code the size and it o...

In the moment I'm a undecided person that is bouncing from a concept of a game to another concept. I'm really bored with programming right now, I'm not sure what to do. I had something to say, but I don't think I'm in the position to be the person that says something good right now hahaha Procastina...

It really depends. I mean, if you need a precise physics simulation you should use Box2D, unless you want to bother with making your own physics engine. Use if you want, but keep in mind it's pretty complex (not hard to learn, though) and it takes a bit of work to make it do things the way you want ...

Really cool! I remember playing a game that was pretty similar in the past.

Great art, great music. A complete game missing a ending! I'm impressed, really.

Telecorpse wrote:

bio1712 wrote:You can use this:

print(math.atan2(A,B)) --radians

Thanks a lot!

Just a small reminder: the function is defined as math.atan2(Y, X). If using in a cartesian plane, the coordinates are flipped (Y first then X).

I'm loving your video updates! You're being my inspiration for sometime now :D Here's the video on how to blow a gorilla up :D mV2m9w3kIKE I guess that if you have squared root it wouldn't be soooo hard. I think it is a great idea for a advanced physics-based level. Problem would be obstacles and th...

God! Brackets is such a nice editor! Feels so nice to use it. I guess I will use it to edit my code, and ZeroBrane Studio to debug it. It's so good looking and easy to use.

Sticking to your notebook is probably a good idea for development. That's what I did and it taught me lots. Thing is, even without anything being processed it only reaches 100 fps tops. Add some simple objects and it goes to 40 real fast. Now, my main computer can run everything with 900+ fps. It's...

Hi guys. I just wanted to know what are your tips to be aware if your game uses too much processing power. Is there even a way to measure this? I'm currently switching between my fucking-beast-8000-computer to my flipplity-doo-1997-notebook, and I'm having some trouble trying to get this right. I'd ...