just to know, why don't you want to use the gpl for löve?

Btw I see this on the wikipedia page about the zlib licence:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zlib_License
GPL compatible Yes

Is the zlib close to the bsd licence ?

A static binary would be nice yes, and easier to redistribute with the games.

on linux you can't put the lib together with the executable binary (I mean, most distributions won't accept this). And when you build the binary, it should be linked to folder requested by the configure (default is usually /usr/local/lib but on request, for official distribution packages, it will be...

I got this "Failed loading /usr/lib/love/./liblove_sdltimer.so: /usr/lib/love/./liblove_sdltimer.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory", but it's just because the lib are supposed to be kept in /usr/lib and nowhere else (like /usr/local/lib for example)

if for one reason or one other the sound is not available on the computer, love refuses to start.

For example for me /dev/dsp had wrong permission, and I got:

"SDLMixerAudio: Unable to open audio!"

It should at least start the game with no sound...

great !

Will you include a working "make install" in the next release ? It would help people to install it.
I've noticed also the makefiles are linking to lua5.1, but it prevents many people to build it on linux (their systems is requesting for lua only)

ok, thank you.

Hello,

most of the demos on this thread are not playable at all with the latest löve 0.3.1 because they refer to a "setBackgroundColor function that doesn't exists.

Was it changed in the core of the system?