Yes I'm so sorry my eyes have just jumped this information :'(

Thanks for answering.


Regards,

Hi, That's should be precised in the wiki x) Thanks for your answer, indeed in the love table there is only love.thread, love.filesystem (wonderful!) and love.data. I'll go with math.random then. [Edit] I did not see the full answer ! Waouw that's really wonderful ! Thanks I was missing something in...

Hi everybody,

Am I missing something or love.math.random cannot be accessed from a new thread created using love.thread.newThread?

I get this error : attempt to index field 'math' (a nil value)

on this line :

That's true.

Originally it was in the love.draw but when I was reading it again for making this post I thought I've done something wrong .

Thanks for confirming and I've just put it back into the love.draw.

Regards

Oh yeah

Thank you so much Slime you are amazing !

That was it I downloaded again and I'm now at 8% CPU usage. That's truly amazing ! Glad I asked

Thanks everybody !


Regards,

Hi, Thanks for your answer. Actually I did not know about love.run and I've not overwritten it. I tried to add the library you liked me to the simple test project I've made and now it goes up to ~190% of CPU with a framerate set on 60. The framerate is stable tho. But it's actually worth :O. Thanks ...

Hey, Thanks for your answer I'm currently on a Macbook Pro and even an empty application with vsync off and just the sleep the CPU is up to ~103% here is the love file for testing purpose. test_cpu.love For the FPS as I said I have a text ingame to show it and it's really a strong and stable 60 fps....

Hello everybody, This a very old topic but it is still an "issue". I've put this piece of code in my main update function : function love.update(dt) next_time = next_time + min_dt [...] local cur_time = love.timer.getTime() if next_time <= cur_time then next_time = cur_time return end love...

You are indeed totally right, there was a double multiplication with 'dt' :) That's was easy to fix and now everything is "perfect", my plans was a bit too hard for my math capacities. In another engine with more math + vector + whatever functions would be probably be easier. But yeah I ag...

You are amazing. You are right I should have isolate the behaviour as you did, but actually I was not expecting a answer like this :awesome: I thought someone would just say : delete this "-" here and put a "*" here... So with self.vx and self.vy I'm adding it to self.x and self....