Wikipedia page

[giniu]

I have no idea why that was turned down...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Topsfield99 that's why? For same reasons lots of small projects are removed, like Awesome window manager for example - though it later came back probably because of community reaction, with different address - but it still can be removed probably for same reasons as before - to give one sample: http://www.brankovukelic.com/post/43094 ... -wikipedia.

[Robin]

We probably have to wait until Nevon writes his article for OMG! Ubuntu!...

[nevon]

We probably have to wait until Nevon writes his article for OMG! Ubuntu!...

Man, I should never have told you. Now everyone is expecting greatness!

[Robin]

From you, we expect no less. Ever.

[Luiji]

I have no idea why that was turned down...

Exorbulently (I'm not sure but I think I made this word up) late reply (was away for awhile), but it was turned down due to lack of good references.

[Felipe Budinich]

We could fake a local newspaper article :-p

[Luiji]

Or just make blog posts and use them as references.

[Lap]

Or just make blog posts and use them as references.

Woah, woah, no need to stoop to conservapedia's level.

[Felipe Budinich]

Or just make blog posts and use them as references.

Actually that's a pretty good idea. I mean, we should not write posts ourselves, but we could create some games and send them to the Boing Boing submitterator. And there is a Chilean blog about games named Dpad, and in fact there is a post about Not Tetris (they forgot to say that it was made with LÖVE... so i wrote a pretty verbose comment)

Woah, woah, no need to stoop to conservapedia's level.

Yeah, we can take it to Encyclopædia Dramatica level.

[Robin]

Woah, woah, no need to stoop to conservapedia's level.

I think the tone of any conservapedia article on LÖVE would be between that of the one on communists and the one on homosexuals.