Future features

General discussion about LÖVE, Lua, game development, puns, and unicorns.
User avatar
Posts: 364
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:24 pm

Re: Future features

Post by mike » Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:23 pm

Suggestion: this thread should be killed (locked) and a new thread should be created in it's place which should mimic the "game resources" thread so that we can keep a track of what features that is wanted and so that people can know what has been said before without having to look through 8 pages of axllslslls explaining that we're doing it wrong. Now, if you'll excuse me I am coughing my lungs out so I will return later.

/mike away
Now posting IN STEREO (where available)

User avatar
Posts: 1051
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:58 pm
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Future features

Post by rude » Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:26 am

Sooner or later the thread will grow big and strong again, and we'll have the same problem.

1) It should be enough that I update the first post, or
2) We should create a separate board for feature requests and future interface discussion.


User avatar
Party member
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:37 pm
Location: Norway/Norge/諾威/挪威 (Yes, I'm teh back!)

Re: Future features

Post by Sardtok » Sat Mar 08, 2008 1:38 am

rude wrote:2) We should create a separate board for feature requests and future interface discussion.
Yes, a single board called Everything, doesn't quite cut it, and an own thread for different feature requests makes a lot of sense.
I figure you were planning on splitting this forum into different boards already, but simply hadn't found the need to yet, or what boards would be needed.
Take off every Zigg for great rapist.
Now, outgay that!

User avatar
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 4:08 pm
Location: City 42, Norway

Re: Future features

Post by fleg » Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:18 am

Right you are, dr. zig.... The board should be divided when the need arises. As long as there isn't that many members, it feels weird, but maybe the time is now? It's normal to gather everything in a single board as long as the member-count is low, and then expand as the need arises. In this way new members aren't frightened by the number of boards, and discussion is stimulated. Mmmmm.

edit: I was mildly retarded when I wrote this, but actually managed to stay somewhat coherent. What a pleasant surprise.

User avatar
Inner party member
Posts: 1941
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:11 pm
Location: Italy

Re: Future features

Post by Nixola » Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:32 pm

rude wrote:
alxs wrote: Oh, I thought you were both equal "partners" here
We kind of are ... although I refuse to accept "partner"; it somehow has a homosexual ring to it. ^.^
You are two men, doing love together... Isn't it enough already?
rude wrote:True ... collision detection is possible to do in Lua, whereas the file handling must be done natively. (Actually, the io library in Lua might be available, but it will soon be made unavailable).
I'll avoid comments on this one

Anyway, why did this thread get lost? It'd be nice discussing about feature suggestion instead of simply suggesting them via issue tracker
lf = love.filesystem
ls = love.sound
la = love.audio
lp = love.physics
lt = love.thread
li = love.image
lg = love.graphics

User avatar
Party member
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 8:02 pm
Location: South Tyrol (Italy)

Re: Future features

Post by Petunien » Sat Sep 08, 2012 8:50 am

Nixola wrote: Anyway, why did this thread get lost?
I think it's because it's about 4 years old. I'd like a *new* thread for discussing about feature suggestions too. :)
"Docendo discimus" - Lucius Annaeus Seneca

User avatar
Sex machine
Posts: 4946
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:35 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Future features

Post by bartbes » Sat Sep 08, 2012 9:36 am

You can make one, but for suggestions you're on the wrong place on the forums, there's an issue tracker for this!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 82 guests