bartbes wrote:micha wrote: In my opinion (and obviously yours as well) it shouldn't do that.
So you want to have two different definitions for the same arc?
I don't understand what you mean by that. Could you please explain?
bartbes wrote:Because if you want to stick with one, and you don't want those lines, then.. what does filled mean?
If you go with the current definition for filled, it only makes sense that when you ask for the outlines you.. get them..
I agree, that when I use filled, I want to have a sector of a circle. The current implementation of the filled option is meaningful.
But also I agree with Nixola:
Nixola wrote:I think that not drawing the radii when in line mode is useful, because they're pretty easy to write on your own, while not drawing them is a bit trickier
This would be inconsistent, but user friendly, as the radii are easy to draw "by hand", while removing them is not.
And one last thing (I had to look it up myself, I am not a native speaker): The term arc refers to the one dimensional line object on the outside of a circle. See here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arc_%28geometry%29. This is probably why I expected the "bend" only, without radii.