## [SOLVED]Surely there's a better way of storing[...]

Questions about the LÖVE API, installing LÖVE and other support related questions go here.
Forum rules
ntpspe
Prole
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 6:19 pm

### [SOLVED]Surely there's a better way of storing[...]

Hey guys, I've managed to create 21 variables that are different each time my game is loaded, which is perfect sure, but the problem lies here.

This is how i've stored them 21 variables (and aquired them)

Code: Select all

	math.randomseed(os.time())
aa = math.random(0,2)
ab = math.random(0,2)
ac = math.random(0,2)
ae = math.random(0,2)
af = math.random(0,2)
ag = math.random(0,2)
ah = math.random(0,2)
ai = math.random(0,2)
aj = math.random(0,2)
ak = math.random(0,2)
al = math.random(0,2)
am = math.random(0,2)
an = math.random(0,2)
ao = math.random(0,2)
ap = math.random(0,2)
aq = math.random(0,2)
ar = math.random(0,2)
as = math.random(0,2)
at = math.random(0,2)
au = math.random(0,2)

and as you can see it's a very long-winded method, and to be honest, I need 410 variables for the example, and probably thousands more for the real thing.

So, as the title says, surely there's a better way of storing my random variables?

Last edited by ntpspe on Thu Aug 11, 2011 12:03 am, edited 1 time in total.

TechnoCat
Inner party member
Posts: 1611
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:31 am
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

### Re: Surely there's a better way of storing my random variabl

Code: Select all

math.randomseed(os.time())
randoms = {}
for i=1, 420 do
table.insert(randoms,math.random(0,2))
end
Access them with randoms[1], randoms[2], ... randoms[n]

ntpspe
Prole
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 6:19 pm

### Re: Surely there's a better way of storing my random variabl

Haha definately a better method Thank you kind sir!

As another request, could you please explain this part:

Code: Select all

for i=1, 420 do
table.insert(randoms,math.random(0,2))

I know it's probably simple, but I've been having trouble with 'for' statements

tentus
Inner party member
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:56 pm
Location: Appalachia
Contact:

### Re: Surely there's a better way of storing my random variabl

"for" is a loop. Whatever is inside it will be executed each time the loop occurs (in this case, 420 times). The difference each time will be the "i" variable, which will increase by one each time the loop occurs.

The "table.insert" function inserts the second parameter into the first parameter (in this case, a table called random).
Kurosuke needs beta testers

ntpspe
Prole
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 6:19 pm

### Re: Surely there's a better way of storing my random variabl

Aah I understand now, thanks. So is it fair to say 'for' is similar to 'while' in a way? (of course 'while' only does it whilst the parameters are met).

Now onto a more complex thinymajig, is there a way to make is so one of the 3 numbers (0,1,2) is more likely to appear? and when I add more numbers?

TechnoCat
Inner party member
Posts: 1611
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:31 am
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

### Re: Surely there's a better way of storing my random variabl

ntpspe wrote:Now onto a more complex thinymajig, is there a way to make is so one of the 3 numbers (0,1,2) is more likely to appear?
Sure
if you want 30% 0, 60% 1 and 10% 2:

Code: Select all

random_table = {}
for i=1, 420 do
local random = math.random()
if random<=0.3 then
random = 0
elseif random<=0.9 then
random = 1
else
random = 2
end
table.insert(random_table,random)
end
Note: 0.3+0.6+0.1 = 1. Your total probability will almost always equal 1.

ntpspe
Prole
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 6:19 pm

### Re: Surely there's a better way of storing my random variabl

elseif random<=0.9 then
Was that meant to be 0.6? And aah thanks a million, you've really helped me out guys! Thanks

TechnoCat
Inner party member
Posts: 1611
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:31 am
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

### Re: Surely there's a better way of storing my random variabl

ntpspe wrote:
elseif random<=0.9 then
Was that meant to be 0.6? And aah thanks a million, you've really helped me out guys! Thanks
No it is not.
It works like this: (0 0.3] is 30%, (0.3 0.9] is 60%, (0.9 1.0] is 10%
interval notation

ntpspe
Prole
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 6:19 pm

### Re: Surely there's a better way of storing my random variabl

(0 0.3] is 30%, (0.3 0.9] is 60%, (0.9 1.0] is 10%
Aah, that's quite complex (as much as I can understand haha) but is it somewhat along the lines of:

0 TO 0.3 is 30%
0.3 TO 0.9 is 60% (0.9-0.3=0.6)
0.9 TO 1.0 is 10% (1.0-0.9=0.1)

Something like that?
So if I had 5 variables, rather than the three currently, would it be
0 TO 0.2 is 20%
0.2 TO 0.4 is 20%
0.4 TO 0.6 is 20%
0.6 TO 0.8 is 20%
0.8 TO 1.0 is 20%
Like that?
(Please let me be right, it makes sense to me lmao)

TechnoCat
Inner party member
Posts: 1611
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:31 am
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

### Re: Surely there's a better way of storing my random variabl

ntpspe wrote:
(0 0.3] is 30%, (0.3 0.9] is 60%, (0.9 1.0] is 10%
Aah, that's quite complex (as much as I can understand haha) but is it somewhat along the lines of:

0 TO 0.3 is 30%
0.3 TO 0.9 is 60% (0.9-0.3=0.6)
0.9 TO 1.0 is 10% (1.0-0.9=0.1)

Something like that?
So if I had 5 variables, rather than the three currently, would it be
0 TO 0.2 is 20%
0.2 TO 0.4 is 20%
0.4 TO 0.6 is 20%
0.6 TO 0.8 is 20%
0.8 TO 1.0 is 20%
Like that?
(Please let me be right, it makes sense to me lmao)
Yes, that is correct. That would be for 5 equally probable events. They are all 20% likely.

### Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 30 guests