I love Ballance! (Yes, that's a present tense)

Not only does this game has a very similar aesthetic, but the Choco-ball's momentum feels exactly the same! Well not really (At least it feels like something between the Wood and Rock Ball).

DerpChest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 8:36 pm It's been 2 to 3 years since a new love version, at least give us something, like a release date or what the no game screen looks like.

You might be looking for features that the current version doesn't have. At least state what they are.

I personally loved it!
It made my day (and it hasn't even started yet). Thanks for this one.

Legend games like these are hard to come by... and get boring when too many people use it consistently.

This is a neat accomplishment! I forgot that I was even playing an alpha demo.

I loled when I got 0 of everything but still "leveled up".

I can't really see what's wrong in your code as well.

All I can think of is that you didn't call RCar:init() before using RCar:update() or something.

How to copy such objects with functions without metatables? I'm not really a good source for an answer to this, but I currently use normal tables. function newObj() local object = {} object.sample_var2 = 'blah' function object:sampleFunction() -- end return object end Now, I just call that function...

For a self-taught programmer, that as very clean and readable code. You seem to be fluent in any language you study. My suggestions will sacrifice some of that cleanness for better coding practices. #1 - There some parts that should make use of love.update . Take menu.update() for an example. functi...

A "boring" game with "boring" graphics with a very very entertaining trailer? That's a deceptive way of presenting your game, sir. And I enjoyed it very much.

pgimeno wrote: ↑Mon Dec 28, 2020 7:44 pm @sphyrth why the double comparison?

I have this a habit of thinking "What if param == nil?", and that slipped into my style. Now that I think about it, it IS unnecessary given the context.

Here's another take: