This: if x then something() else if y then something_else() end is exactly the same as this: if x then something() else if y then something_else() end In the latter case, you can clearly see how the else is not closed. That's why we have elseif . This is properly closed: if x then something() elseif...

There's also an indentation problem within FallingSand:update(). This IF statement: is closed at the very end of the function, but the indentation suggests that that's not the intention.

You can't reliably use ipairs() in that circumstance either. You have to either loop backwards, which ipairs() doesn't do, or manually advance the index or decrease the count as appropriate, like the loop I posted does.

[...] local function drawImages() for i, imageData in ipairs(ImagesToDraw) do [...] if imageData.y < 600 then love.graphics.draw(image, imageData.x, imageData.y, imageData.r, 0.5, 0.5, 256/2, 256/2) else image:release() ImagesToDraw[image] = nil currentCoins = currentCoins - 1 end end end Deletion ...

I'm concerned about this condition in your code: if py ~= lastY then Does that mean that polygons with vertical segments can't be used? From my tests, they can be used. For example, the polygon in the OP has some neighboring points with the same vertical coordinates (py == lastY), and the same hori...

Ehhh, here's something weird. From my tests, that Lua-based method in the OP is slightly faster than the Box2D one. Point for LuaJIT I guess, it's probably optimizing that function amazingly. I honestly thought the C++ one would be faster. I'm not too surprised. In LuaJIT, external function calls v...

This looks like if anything, it should be reported to FreeType.

It'd need to provide the exact same thing as a (perhaps unpacked) appimage of love at that point, right? Since you'd also want all of love's dependencies to be the version you made your game for as well otherwise you'll run into similar problems. <snip> I'm not sure how any of that is relevant when...

That's pretty impressive!

I don't think this is usually true. As a game developer you wouldn't want to rely on a global install of love on someone else's system having a version that's coincidentally compatible with your code. And if you use something like Unity instead of love and it somehow allowed that (which it doesn't)...