MD5 Implementation

[TheMeq]

Hi All, thought I would share this. It's not by me, it's by Enrique García Cota, Adam Baldwin, hanzao and Equi 4 Software, purely implemented in Lua.

Code: Select all

md5 = require("md5")

Code: Select all

response = md5.sumhexa("hello")
response = 5d41402abc4b2a76b9719d911017c592

md5.lua

(10.42 KiB) Downloaded 255 times

Enjoy

[zorg]

Pray tell, why are you exactly uploading things that are already on github?

[TheMeq]

didn't realise it was there...

/thread

please delete

/forum.quit()

[bobbyjones]

lol kikito is part of this forum so im sure most of his work is already known.

[undef]

It also only works on small filles/strings.

[kikito]

The size problems only happen in lua 5.1, and are due to the lack of binary ops (they are simulated with strings and tables, and memory runs out). We use luajit in LÖVE, so it should work ok here.

I could do some rewiring to make lua 5.1 work better, but it isn't really a priority.

[undef]

We use luajit in LÖVE, so it should work ok here.

Actually, I had the problem in LuaJIT.
I just didn't report it because somebody else already did it.

[kikito]

Hi undef,

If you can, please comment on that issue then. The Lua 5.1 case was almost definitively an efficiency-related problem. If you have found a problem in LuaJIT, that might indicate a problem in the implementation. (Please make sure to include a sample failing file if you can).

[undef]

Hey Kikito,

sorry I didn't report this earlier, I found this bug in two days after it has been first reported, so once I was finally sure it was a bug with your libary (looked for my own mistake forever at first) I found that someone else already reported it so I thought it'll be fine.

So here's an example:

If I take the md5 sum of the libary itself I sometimes get "221f0d89221f0d89221f0d89221f0d89" and sometimes "e4559a35e5559a35e6559a35e6559a35".
Using md5sum on linux however I get "74b44e222b63de5f10917c2accdbce21".

I made a weird example that seems to reliably produce both outputs and makes sure the problem is not with love's read function:

Code: Select all

local md5 = require"md5"

local content = love.filesystem.read"md5.lua"
print( md5.sumhexa( content ) )
print( md5.sumhexa( content ) )
print( md5.sumhexa( content ) )
print( md5.sumhexa( content ) )

love.event.quit()

Produces:

Code: Select all

e4559a35e5559a35e6559a35e6559a35
e4559a35e5559a35e6559a35e6559a35
e4559a35e5559a35e6559a35e6559a35
e4559a35e5559a35e6559a35e6559a35

But if you comment out the last print statement:

Code: Select all

local md5 = require"md5"

local content = love.filesystem.read"md5.lua"
print( md5.sumhexa( content ) )
print( md5.sumhexa( content ) )
print( md5.sumhexa( content ) )
--print( md5.sumhexa( content ) )

love.event.quit()

You get this output:

Code: Select all

221f0d89221f0d89221f0d89221f0d89
221f0d89221f0d89221f0d89221f0d89
221f0d89221f0d89221f0d89221f0d89

This is all very weird to me and if you find out what caused this bug, please let me know!
I would really like to know how this can happen, considering that all the outputs are always uniform.
I think knowing how this happens might be something worth learning.

[kikito]

This is indeed weird. Just to confirm: which version of Lua are you using to do this? Is it the one embedded with LÖVE, the standalone, linux, mac, windows?