LÖVE

pauljessup wrote: ↑Thu Dec 09, 2021 4:03 am Every single thing I say, you're going to want to turn it into an argument. [...] you're just wanting to argue for the sake or arguing.

1. "Programmer art" is a widely-recognized technical term in video game development communities that literally means "placeholder graphics",
2. Your placeholder graphics are therefore an instance of "programmer art".

Xii wrote: ↑Thu Dec 09, 2021 7:41 pm

pauljessup wrote: ↑Thu Dec 09, 2021 4:03 am Every single thing I say, you're going to want to turn it into an argument. [...] you're just wanting to argue for the sake or arguing.

Every single thing you say that's wrong, yeah, I'm going to correct you. Especially if your statement is simply a baseless claim that my correction is wrong. Which is pretty much all you've been doing. "That's not programmer art", you say, "that's just placeholder", you say, repeatedly, never acknowledging the contents of my arguments, always getting stuck on some "choise of words" that in your mind apparently makes me an adversary with a vendetta whose only mission in life is to troll you.

Then you toss your hands in the air, declare your intent to ignore the discussion, and then the very next second nevertheless continue it, only inviting more frustration and ridicule on your part. How many times we gonna go around in circles until you admit that:

1. "Programmer art" is a widely-recognized technical term in video game development communities that literally means "placeholder graphics",
2. Your placeholder graphics are therefore an instance of "programmer art".

When you agree to these points then we agree on the contents of the discussion. If you disagree on a given point, please include an actual argument for why the point is incorrect. Please refrain from replying to any percieved tone in my request and just reply to the request itself.

pauljessup wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 11:10 pm Yup, that's me!

I still have to update the new webpage and get all of my short stories and stuff on there.