Search found 28 matches
- Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:27 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: These forums are dead nowadays.
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13838
Re: These forums are dead nowadays.
Sorry about that. Somebody took over my account and started shitposting. Looking into how he did that.
- Mon Jul 04, 2016 12:39 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: These forums are dead nowadays.
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13838
These forums are dead nowadays.
Title.
What do you think about this?
I think this is bad, we should start a revolution to try and get this forum active again, lol.
What do you think about this?
I think this is bad, we should start a revolution to try and get this forum active again, lol.
- Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:09 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Can we see the current changelog for 0.5.1?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 13735
Re: Can we see the current changelog for 0.5.1?
I would post it if rude gave me permission (he's fast asleep atm).
- Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:23 pm
- Forum: Support and Development
- Topic: .conf /.cfg?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 19514
Re: .conf /.cfg?
It still counts goddamnit!!mike wrote:What year is this?
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/ms-razz.png)
- Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:28 am
- Forum: Support and Development
- Topic: Proper random number generation and radian/degree.
- Replies: 22
- Views: 25585
Re: Proper random number generation and radian/degree.
May I humbly suggest that we implement the multiply-with-carry pseudo-random number generator? According to G. Marsaglia, it is better than Mersenne twister (current favorite) because it's fast AND provides better period. You can read about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiply-with-carry
- Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:22 am
- Forum: Support and Development
- Topic: .conf /.cfg?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 19514
Re: .conf /.cfg?
ACTUALLY...
*.conf DOES use ONE WHOLE EXTRA BYTE of RESOURCES because of the extra letter (*.cfg has only three). So technically, it will take a few more CPU cycles to parse that string.![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/ms-o_O.png)
Also, I'm pretty sure it will use some more cycles looking the file up on the drive.
*.conf DOES use ONE WHOLE EXTRA BYTE of RESOURCES because of the extra letter (*.cfg has only three). So technically, it will take a few more CPU cycles to parse that string.
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/ms-o_O.png)
Also, I'm pretty sure it will use some more cycles looking the file up on the drive.
- Sun Sep 21, 2008 6:22 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: LÖVE 0.5.0
- Replies: 37
- Views: 33662
Re: LÖVE 0.5.0
2) What version of GCC are you using? If it's 4.3.x, it's untested because I'm not running any distros with it atm. Can you find out which library is depending on allegro? And whether or not adding all of those links are necessary? 3) This is a GCC 4.3.x feature afaik. Rude will fix it. 4) Ooopsie.....
- Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:14 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: How Did You Find (true) LÖVE?
- Replies: 55
- Views: 57345
Re: How Did You Find (true) LÖVE?
Rude told me about it some time back (can't remember when), and I wanted in on it (good learning opportunity, I guess). Haven't had much time to read the code tho. So I ended up being a Linux maintainer.
- Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:49 pm
- Forum: Support and Development
- Topic: Löve on *BSD
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7096
Re: Löve on *BSD
Hi, If you're compiling from the repository, automagic should work now, ie. ./configure make make install Otherwise, I think 0.5.0 is around the corner. I haven't tried *BSD before, so tell me how you fare. PS. Sorry I took so long to get to you. I'm not exactly known for being active in communities.
- Tue Jul 15, 2008 9:25 am
- Forum: Support and Development
- Topic: [linux] Sound problem
- Replies: 18
- Views: 23458
Re: [linux] Sound problem
I woke up and just thought of it:
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/ms-glad.png)
Code: Select all
if (SDLSound)
load(SDLSound);
else
load(PCSpeaker);
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/ms-glad.png)