rude wrote:Well, now that we've decided to make all constants into strings, maybe something like "nearest".

Is there a list of them anywhere?

Jammang wrote:No bugs found on my pc so far, although older game versions do not run, I thought love was backwards compatible?

Elaborate on "do not run"?

Oh, that is a nice little game. I do like the depth feature too, really nicely done! Simple, but effective.

You could try something along the lines of Construct, and have an unstable build, and if there are below a certain number of (critical) bugs declare it to be stable?

SnakeFace wrote:Will this major rewrite not just majorly mess up all current games? D= oh noes!

This is a pre-1.0 release, so things like API breakage are to be expected.

Removing conf files - so it'd be up to the coder to set up that information in main.lua then?

Thought about using OGRE?

To bring this back up, something relevant: one of the Glibc developers (one of the key ones, too) is causing enough strife for Debian to switch to a fork of it. Community-versus-developer(s).

http://www.rojtberg.net/258/another-linux-jerk-down/
http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=47

I understand there may be the possibility for being able to pixel-level collision when the ability to read pixels is added, but as for being a out-of-the-box collision detection method, unlikely.

This is an intriguing little title! Nicely done.