bartbes wrote:Ah btw, rude, why aren't there any mac builds? Did you kick it out of your build chain?

iirc, rude doesn't have access to his mac right now.

Can someone walk me through building Love 0.6.0 on OS X? Okay! First, make sure you're running 10.5 or later. LÖVE 0.6.0 won't work on Tiger or earlier. And we haven't tested it on Snow Leopard yet as far as I know, but it should run without exploding too badly. No promises though. Next, make sure ...

They work fine for me in the (as yet unpushed) Mac build; what exactly doesn't work?

Actually it's ' ', not 'space'. But yeah.

To quit, you need to call love.event.push('q').

This will be changing in LÖVE 0.6.0, as it now uses string constants.

So, mode would be either "alpha" (normal) or "additive".

F687/s wrote:(probably something from DuckTales or similar

MOON THEME!
plz

I can attest to Unicode paths working properly under LÖVE 0.6.0 on Mac OS X.

(Then again, they also work properly under LÖVE 0.5.0 on Mac OS X, so I don't know...)

rude wrote:Anjo: which PhysFS did you use for the MacOSX binaries?

I'm pretty sure I'm using the same PhysFS used in the Mac version of LÖVE 0.5.0, which I'm fairly certain is not 2.0. I'll recompile it from source to get 2.0 working, after I get some sleep.

I want a 64-bit OS X version that can still run on 32-bit and PPC in a Universal Binary. Instead of just a 32-bit/PPC binary. Do you have a 64-bit Mac to compile one on, anjo? Or is it 32-bit only because you don't have a C2D? Not that it matters. Would a 64-bit version of Löve for either OS even m...

I'm not entirely sure what you're asking here, but it's nearly 3 AM and I'm tired so I'm going to chalk it up to that. In LÖVE 0.6.0 there's a few facilities that might enable you to do what I think you want to do. Most importantly, the addition of the ImageData class, which gives you a representati...