This is great. My nitpick: The name "LÖVELINESS" wasn't searchable in the Chrome web store by typing loveliness , nor did Google show it for the search site:love2d.org loveliness . Also, this did not work for me in Chromium on Linux Mint 12, despite turning on the NaCl flag. I can send mor...

What is your opinion on using Java for the UI and for launching LOVE? Keeping everything inside the LOVE window would make for a better game experience if done well. Let's say that for some reason you need to open the UI in the middle of the game -- you can't if it's in Java. Plus, some of us batsh...

Kikito, I think your simplifications are more in line with the library style. I think its semi-minimal nature is one of the attractive things about it. I too find that "once" is rare, and I wouldn't mind manually coding it in my game. Have you considered using an argument table? newAnimati...

Whoa, holy fuck, this is beautiful. I wish I'd seen this a month ago when I started my level editor. (Still, I am quite happy with Quickie.) I'd love to dive into the code for this when I have time.

Very nice work, Nikolai!

Output: It took me a minute to realize that you meant that's the output you're not getting. You're getting nil, right? That's because you are creating an anonymous function and passing it to t[]. You're passing the function object (whose index in the table obviously wasn't previously defined), not ...

not to mention, it's much nicer mathematically; multiply two of these ranges and your result will also be in that range That's an excellent point I forgot to mention. "1.0" acts as "100%", which means that amplification works simply through pure multiplication. 1 x 1 x 1 is stil...

Headchant created a tutorial for just this purpose: Part 1 Part 2 I wonder why setSample is between -1 and 1 rather than 0 to 0xFF or 0 to 0xFFFF In user applications that deal with manipulating audio, the signal is almost always represented as amplitude between -1.0 and 1.0. It's much more intuitiv...

Nice. But I suggest that in the future you attach the .love archive in your post. It would have taken about 90 seconds for the community to spot the problem here if the entire code were available.

What about just normal use; not a bullet? Unless I am mistaken the smearing would only be useful for projectiles (a single line). Not necessarily. Your moving body could have any path you want; only the "anti-tunneling" shapes which interpolate between the updates would be straight. The e...

I notice that your snippet lives inside a conditional statement (elseif gameOver then ...). Are you sure that gameOver is evaluating to true? Try just putting the code inside love.draw() without if/elseif/else, as in tentus' screenshot.