bobbyjones wrote:Did you post a link to your github?

I think I forgot Sorry.

https://github.com/pgimeno/Gspot

Done. I've submitted my commits too, but I suspect they overlap with your changes. My changes keep LÖVE 0.9.1 compatibility so that Debian Stable users can also benefit from the library (and possibly 0.9.0, but I didn't try). I've based it on the original repo, and merged in SiENcE's changes. Unfort...

I've got UTF-8 and imagemode working locally and could submit patches. If you're not interested in maintaining it, I am.

Nice! I made something similar to this a long time ago in Pascal with some friends, and more recently reimplemented it in JavaScript. The explanation is in Spanish though. But it allows speciation (try random seed 4 to watch two species arise, the "light seekers" and the "straight wal...

Thanks. Since it's an option controlled by the programmer, I take it that it's a safety, rather than a security, measure (as in protecting programmers against themselves, rather than protecting users against potentially malicious software). The use of 'security' in the wording of that report confuse...

I'm trying to use symbolic links under Linux to avoid duplicating entire trees with libraries, or to make quick workarounds for case sensitivity problems in some love programs. But they are behaving weird. Say we have an empty init.lua in directory 'lib', and a main.lua that requires 'Lib', and then...

I love this thread! I already posted in the support forum a program that qualifies, but since it's not very long I'll repost it with the fix applied: lg = love.graphics lp = love.physics le = love.event lma = love.math local world local shapes local function newShape(n, x, y, r, ang) local pts = {} ...

Both print and printf will set themselves exactly once. So calling print and printf beforehand should do the trick. Ahh, I see the problem now. This works: love.graphics.print("") local orig_print = love.graphics.print function love.graphics.print(...) print("Entered") orig_prin...

Pressing the key in following order: lshift down, right arrow down and up, kp5 down and up, lshift up I would expect the following output: lshift +lshift right +lshift kp5 +lshift [...] And another question: when I press ralt, the script outputs 'ralt +lctrl +ralt'. Is there a reason, that pressing...

Which LÖVE version are you using? In 0.9.1 and older LÖVE will do that, but in 0.9.2 and newer it shouldn't. Yes, 0.9.1. Thank you. And it only does it once. Good to know too. EDIT I'm calling love.graphics.printf() in main to get rid of that first time and it's not working. Does it do so elsewhere...