https://nsa40.casimages.com/img/2019/01/17//190117091114821698.png https://nsa40.casimages.com/img/2019/01/17//190117091114821698.png https://nsa40.casimages.com/img/2019/01/17//190117091114821698.png https://nsa40.casimages.com/img/2019/01/17//190117091114821698.png https://nsa40.casimages.com/img...

I only stated what wasn't confortable for me

do as you want with the code, i have a repo for it that i'll update to implement queries etc : https://github.com/4v0v/LOVE_PHYSICS What i don't like is more or less only code structure: -too much useless comments -too much loc -separate files -separate mlib library for only 2 functions Also fixture...

You don't have to declare local i / local k , v when you do

for i = 0, 10 do ... end
&
for k,v in pairs(tbl) do ... end

I've rewritten your and the windfield library to match my style more (didn't implement queries yet). local lp, lg = love.physics, love.graphics local function _set_funcs(obj1, obj2) for k, v in pairs(obj2.__index) do if k~="__gc" and k~="__eq" and k~="__index" and k~=&q...

Don't know if this will help but here is my love.run where I handle inputs to do if pressed("key") then ... end in love.update : function love.run() local dt = 0 local _INPUT = {current_state = {}, previous_state = {}} function pressed(key) return _INPUT.current_state[key] and not _INPUT.p...