Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERUN]
- Jasoco
- Inner party member
- Posts: 3725
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 9:35 am
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
- Contact:
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2
What's your computer specs? You can support pretty much anything. (I don't know what the maximum size is out there, but I put in the 8192 size just in case. Real world usage would probably rarely need more than 1024x1024 and maybe 1 or 2 of them.
- BlackBulletIV
- Inner party member
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:19 pm
- Location: Queensland, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
Sorry guys about the .love issue, and the bug that anjo kindly pointed out. I've updated this test to fix that bug, and run size tests. My computer comes out with everything! And sizes of 4096 x 4096 and 2187 x 2187! Not bad for 64 MB of shared memory.
If everyone could re-run the tests, that would be great.
If everyone could re-run the tests, that would be great.
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
Woohoo, looks like I support everything.
Edit: Nice typo there! "framesbuffers"
Edit: Nice typo there! "framesbuffers"
Do you recognise when the world won't stop for you? Or when the days don't care what you've got to do? When the weight's too tough to lift up, what do you? Don't let them choose for you, that's on you.
- BlackBulletIV
- Inner party member
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:19 pm
- Location: Queensland, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
Awesome!
EDIT: Fixed the typo .
EDIT: Fixed the typo .
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
You might wanna add a little message saying that the post-spacebar operations will take a few seconds too. I was bashing space because I had no idea what was going on.
Edit: Interesting. While I was having a paranoid moment and making sure there was no message already, I noticed that it worked it out much faster than the first run. Is this a systemy/processy cache thing? Or am I just overtired...
Edit: Interesting. While I was having a paranoid moment and making sure there was no message already, I noticed that it worked it out much faster than the first run. Is this a systemy/processy cache thing? Or am I just overtired...
Last edited by Lafolie on Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
Do you recognise when the world won't stop for you? Or when the days don't care what you've got to do? When the weight's too tough to lift up, what do you? Don't let them choose for you, that's on you.
- nevon
- Commander of the Circuloids
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:25 pm
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
Your test died once it started trying to create framebuffers, so I don't know if my computer supports non-Po2 framebuffers or not. Couldn't you put the tests in pcalls so that the test won't die if it fails?
- bartbes
- Sex machine
- Posts: 4946
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:35 am
- Location: The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
Code: Select all
You support:
Framebuffers
Non-Po2 Framebuffers
Non-Po2 Images
Framebuffers up to the size 16384 x 16384
Power of 3 Framebuffers up to the size 19683 x 19683
- BlackBulletIV
- Inner party member
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:19 pm
- Location: Queensland, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
I guess it takes a few seconds for you because your Po3 FB support is so good. It takes a few milliseconds for me. I'm putting up one now.Lafolie wrote:You might wanna add a little message saying that the post-spacebar operations will take a few seconds too. I was bashing space because I had no idea what was going on.
I put them in pcalls. I don't what the problem is there. I think BarnD has completed the test without FB support.nevon wrote:Your test died once it started trying to create framebuffers, so I don't know if my computer supports non-Po2 framebuffers or not. Couldn't you put the tests in pcalls so that the test won't die if it fails?
Next up from power of 2. I can't create tonnes of framebuffers by doing it in increments of 5 or something. Powers help to condition how many sizes we create.bartbes wrote:Power of 3?Code: Select all
You support: Framebuffers Non-Po2 Framebuffers Non-Po2 Images Framebuffers up to the size 16384 x 16384 Power of 3 Framebuffers up to the size 19683 x 19683
- bartbes
- Sex machine
- Posts: 4946
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:35 am
- Location: The Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
Yeah, same here, took pretty long. On the other hand, I gave up on jasoco's test after 30 seconds of completely freezing my computer, I had to do a hard reset.BlackBulletIV wrote: I guess it takes a few seconds for you because your Po3 FB support is so good. It takes a few milliseconds for me. I'm putting up one now.
- BlackBulletIV
- Inner party member
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:19 pm
- Location: Queensland, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Survey: Do You Support Framebuffers and/or Non-Po2 [RERU
It would take long considering your supported resolutions! I'll put one up that gives a message saying what it's doing.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests