Ok, next question: does this work? http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4214717/snayketest.love
It's snayke but the background is grey and doesn't change (I disabled the code that uses framebuffers to draw the fancy background and replaced it with that simple thing), bloom is still there though.

There's an issue with one of the updated frameworks that prevents it from working on anything other than Lion or something. anjo will fix it I think.

GijsB: can you download this test thing and see if you get the same sort of issue? I'm trying to figure out if your problem is caused specifically by the bloom shader itself or by the combination of it and the rest of Snayke.

Dammit... that's fucked. Can you try pressing "]" (right bracket) ingame and post a screenshot of that? You can also disable the bloom with "[" (left bracket).

Can you run it using a more recent build of LÖVE? That one seems to be more than 3 months old.

Perhaps you are relying on something that is technically undefined, as LÖVE currently is.

GijsB, can you test the latest version for me? It has a fix that should make shader error messages say the right thing.

EDIT: nevermind, got someone else to test for me.

LuaJIT is nearly bug free. It is also a drop-in replacement for Lua so as long as you don't use the FFI you will get pretty much 100% compatibility with Lua 5.1.4 and love. There is a bug in the latest love source code (reliance on order which is technically undefined) which causes love 0.8.0 to cra...

Compile it with LuaJIT for ARM, then pure Lua code might be faster than the Java code in some cases.

Yeah, that's the only thing you need to change besides calling mycanvas:clear() before setting the render target to it if you want it to clear every frame.

It doesn't automatically update, but I try to keep it almost on par with the love repository because I build the new commits anyway.