If a non-universal unreliable 0.8 version appear I would prefer work in 0.72 because I think reliability that my program work anywhere is more important that work with Love state-of-art gfx power. Just my two cents guys. It's up to the game developer (me, in this case) to choose what features to us...

Well, I'm sorry to read that you both say, that's bad. Going for that way will ruin it the good thing of Love that is be like universal in all 3 major OS's whatever the machine. Going that way make Love so less useful and if is trying to do super-gfx stuff better starting pure coding languages like...

http://feedback.wildfiregames.com/repor ... fer_object

Framebuffer support is very dependent on drivers. It's most likely a driver issue unless your video card was made > 10 years ago.

bartbes wrote:DirectX, thankfully, has nothing to do with love. Ever. EVER.

Quoted in case you edit! <.< >.>

even though you can edit this post too

As others have mentioned, you should probably use a pure Lua solution if you really want XML parsing. http://lua-users.org/wiki/LuaXml

Also, Lua is not an acronym. It's Lua, not LUA.
I used JAVASCRIPT and PYTHON the other day, but I like the LUA language more.

Personally I find much, much easier to read than an XML file.

Why not use pure Lua files which just have a table inside them, and then loadstring or love.filesystem.load that?

Free and open source, not that the source is particularly interesting or pretty.

What kind of computer/video card do you have coffee? Very few these days don't support framebuffers/canvases at all.

What sort of effects?