Thanks, with the "rough" style works like it must. But why the square doesn't need this trick? It makes by default exactly one pixel wide lines. It's a good question, and I don't have the answer. It appears as if setLineWidth is clamped to 1.1 or so for love.graphics.line. It's also possi...

We don't know what your coordinates are, but assuming they are centred in the pixel, you can use love.graphics.setLineStyle("rough") to get rid of the issue.

Hello, welcome to the forums! Since you're in Linux, the easiest way is probably to compile it from source. First, make sure you have git, then clone the repository, then run 'git checkout 0.10.2' and then try to compile it (see *nix instructions in https://github.com/love2d/love). Note that you nee...

Depending on how often and how many of those lists you create at run time (or how many of them are unique, for that matter), I think you could use love.image.newImageData and ImageData:setPixel to effectively create and store those lists in memory as image data objects. That way you could draw one ...

hi Juanjo! Hm, I see a problem with setting player.grounded = false. I think you should set it to false right before updating the world, and set it to true when the player is touching the ground (but not to false). That is: function preSolve(a, b, coll) if a:getUserData().properties.type == "gr...

The program does not need to be in a .love file in order to be executed. You develop using a folder with regular files instead of a .love file, and then pack it into a .love file when ready.

Here's a basic shaders introduction: http://blogs.love2d.org/content/beginners-guide-shaders

My love2d extension run 'love --console .' Is this similar to lovec.exe ? I tried lovec.exe and can't see any difference. I don't have Windows, so I can't tell for sure, but I believe lovec.exe is a "console application", meaning it's the OS who creates and attaches the console, while wit...

The disk thing is a good idea and is gonna need to me implemented anyways, I went ahead and made a much smaller and quicker and just generally less messy version of this and its working a lot better. With that being said, is there a fast and efficient way of storing tables on disk? You need seriali...

Is it possible that you're running main.love instead of main.lua, and that main.love does not have the files? What happens if you remove main.love and run Löve passing the folder as argument?