The epic love demo thread!

Showcase your libraries, tools and other projects that help your fellow love users.
User avatar
tido
Prole
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 4:08 pm
Contact:

Re: The epic love demo thread!

Post by tido »

Old'd'd'd'd'dd'd'd'dd'd'd'ddddd
User avatar
mike
Administrator
Posts: 364
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:24 pm

Re: The epic love demo thread!

Post by mike »

Old, but still epic. And beware, BOY, cause I got admin powerz.
Now posting IN STEREO (where available)
User avatar
Merkoth
Party member
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:43 pm
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: The epic love demo thread!

Post by Merkoth »

Due to popular demand, let me introduce the unofficial, totally awesome and extremely gay LOVE Benchmark demo! GFX ripped from other demos :)

Teh screenz:
Image

Image

And teh filez:
http://www.cloverpunk.com.ar/tehstuffs/ ... hmark.love

Edit: Uploaded new version, now you can make stuff rotate
User avatar
rude
Administrator
Posts: 1051
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:58 pm
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: The epic love demo thread!

Post by rude »

(Link is broken. You forgot to rename from .zip :3)

Hehe, cool. On my v-synced machine, the screen is full of pink primitives before the FPS drops below 60, so it's hard to actually see anything. But for LÖVE-logos, the threshold (where 60 FPS becomes 59) is around 3700. Rotation, blending and other stuff had little effect.

Also, if Ivan wants to use this for benchmarking, we obviously need:
  • A script without the LÖVE-logo. :D
  • A script with features that both engines have. (Does AGen have additive blending?)
Also note that it's not possible to disable blending in LÖVE, like your demo would suggest. The choices are "additive" or "normal".

Edit: also, I don't think this is the best way to benchmark. We should measure the time used to draw one frame, not the FPS. Guess we'll have to add this in 0.2.2:

Code: Select all

t_start = love.timer.getTime()
-- draw here
t_end = love.timer.getTime()
t_used = t_end - t_start
User avatar
ivan
Party member
Posts: 1736
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 1:39 pm
Contact:

Re: The epic love demo thread!

Post by ivan »

Here's a quickie that I made using a fresh and untested build of AGen.
Ok, so I have a couple of excuses... I mean things to point out :)
I had to turn off the fonts since I'm currently playing around with the GUI elements.
Z-ordering doesn't work in this build since the render was rewritten a few weeks ago, in order to support a wider ranger of video plugins.
That's why I had to draw the background image with alpha, since there's no way I can ensure it is rendered BEFORE the boxes.
This is a new build so don't be suprised if it crashes. :oops:
Lastly, sorry that I used the Love logo, but I was too lazy to find another image.

There's no color blending in AGen although it should be pretty simple to add.
Right now color modulation only works per sprite although it could easily be made to work per layer as well.
This way, you won't have to iterate over all the objects when you want to change the modulation factor at the same time.
also, I don't think this is the best way to benchmark. We should measure the time used to draw one frame, not the FPS
Yeah, you're right. In AGen there is a preset target FPS (which ideally should be the monitor's refresh rate).
It's 60 by default which is 0.0166666667 seconds per frame.
The "update" function is not called more frequently than that since it's pointless to alter the scene more often than you redraw it.
0.0166666667 * delta will give you the time elapsed between frames although as I said, it will never be < 0.0166666667.

Otherwise, the "quickie" that I made is way slower than Love.
There's a number of reasons for this, but the major slowdown is rebuilding the scene graph.
Loads of moving objects will slow things down considerably - the payoff is fast culling, collision detection and instancing of the static geometry.
I've included a "underthehood" version of the framework - just rename it to "framework.dll" and you'll see what I'm talking about. ;)
User avatar
rude
Administrator
Posts: 1051
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:58 pm
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: The epic love demo thread!

Post by rude »

ivan wrote:Lastly, sorry that I used the Love logo, but I was too lazy to find another image.
At the time I thought maybe you would get offended (probably silly of me). You can of course use the logo everywhere for all I care. ^_^
ivan wrote:There's a number of reasons for this, but the major slowdown is rebuilding the scene graph.
Aha. You have to rebuild the scenegraph when something moves ... that would slow things down. Isn't it better to be able to do this:

Code: Select all

-- Init:
scene.add_child(sprite)
-- Update:
sprite:move() -- Or similar
And then not destroying the entire scene every frame? I know it makes spatial partitioning a pain in the ass, but it would probably be worth it. You know how it is with games. Stuff move.
the payoff is fast culling, collision detection and instancing of the static geometry
Yeah ... this benchmark does not exactly illustrate all aspects of game creation, but it's a start.
User avatar
ivan
Party member
Posts: 1736
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 1:39 pm
Contact:

Re: The epic love demo thread!

Post by ivan »

rude wrote:Aha. You have to rebuild the scenegraph when something moves ... that would slow things down. Isn't it better to be able to do this:
Nah, when you make a change to the scene, it locks the entire branch of the graph up to the root of the tree.
The locked branch is later rebuilt from the bottom up automatically, so that you don't have to do a thing.
Actually, I did a few test and it turns out that the scene graph is not causing any slowdown at all.
The problem was in the lua binder and the way the "position" property is exported.

Anyways, this test is pretty simple and I like it, however I propose a slight change in the script to simplify it:

Code: Select all

-- initialize
function main ( )
	object_list = { }

	paused = false
	moving = false
	rotating = false
end

-- enable disable the different test
keyboard.on_press = function ( k )
	if k == KEY_1 then
		paused = not paused
	elseif k == KEY_2 then
		moving = not moving
	elseif k == KEY_3 then
		rotating = not rotating
	end
end

-- update
game.on_update = function ( )
	-- clock time between updates
	window.title = "objects:" .. #object_list .. " fps:" .. game:get_fps ( ) .. " delta:" .. game:get_delta ( )
	local delta = game:get_delta ( )

	-- do not iterate if paused
	if paused == false then
		for k,v in ipairs ( object_list ) do

			-- motion
			if moving == true then
				v.position.x = v.position.x + v.inc_x * delta
				v.position.y = v.position.y + v.inc_y * delta
				
				if v.position.x < 0 - 400 or v.position.x > 800 - 400 then
					v.inc_x = -v.inc_x
				end
				
				if v.position.y < 0 - 300 or v.position.y > 600 - 300 then
					v.inc_y = -v.inc_y
				end
			end

			-- rotation
			if rotating == true then
				v.rotation = v.rotation + v.inc_rot * delta
			end
		end
	end

	-- create 5 new objects
	if keyboard:is_down ( KEY_UP ) then
		for i = 0, 5 do
			local s = Sprite ( math.random ( 0, 800 ) - 400, math.random ( 0, 600 ) - 300 )

			-- size
			s.w = math.random ( 10, 20 )
			s.h = math.random ( 10, 20 )

			-- create object
			s.canvas:rectangle ( s.w, s.h )
			s.canvas:set_fill_style ( Color(255,0,0), 1 )
			s.canvas:fill ( )
			scene:add_child ( s )

			-- motion
			s.inc_x = math.random ( -100,100 ) / 100
			s.inc_y = math.random ( 100,100 ) / 100

			-- rotation
			s.inc_rot = math.random ( -5, 5 )

			table.insert ( object_list, s )
		end
	end

	-- release 5 existing objects
	if keyboard:is_down ( KEY_DOWN ) then
		local diff = 5
		if #object_list < diff then
			diff = #object_list - 1
		end
		for i = 0, diff do
			local s = table.remove ( object_list )
			scene:remove_child ( s )
		end 
	end
end
I don't know if it it's just me, but in the last demo, I think there was a bug that was causing flicker as objects were being removed on and off.
Also, this script makes it a little easier to add new tests.
Yeah, I know it's not written using the Love syntax, but that could easily be changed.
I propose the following tests:
1.motion
2.rotation
3.scaling
4.textures
5.color modulation
6.different blending modes
Err? What else?
User avatar
Merkoth
Party member
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:43 pm
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: The epic love demo thread!

Post by Merkoth »

ivan, I also experienced the flicker bug, but it was 2 am when I finished that script. I'm currently trying to complete a little game for a compo, so I won't be able to fix that bug and/or port your script to löve right now :/

Edit: completely misread your post, I was referring to my demo, not yours :/
Last edited by Merkoth on Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
rude
Administrator
Posts: 1051
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:58 pm
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: The epic love demo thread!

Post by rude »

I didn't notice any flicker ...

There is bug with the logos when they move, though. Some white pixels appears at the bottom of the image.

Noticed that the scene can be scaled and rotated using the mouse. Nice! ^^
ivan wrote:Err? What else?
7. Primitives
8. Text rendering
User avatar
ivan
Party member
Posts: 1736
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 1:39 pm
Contact:

Re: The epic love demo thread!

Post by ivan »

Merkoth, the flicker occurs in both mine and your demo (since I used your code)
I think it's caused by the way objects are removed from the table.
It should be fixed it in the script that I posted above.
Noticed that the scene can be scaled and rotated using the mouse. Nice! ^^
Haha, thanks. That's one of the perks of having a large framework.
It makes the difficult thinks simple and simple things difficult (like changing the order in which sprites are rendered).
7. Primitives
8. Text rendering
Maybe it could toggle when you press the spacebar between moving rectangles, textures or text.

By the way, I played around with the AGen binder last night and have to say that the next demo should be more comparable to Love in speed.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: groverburger and 12 guests