![Image](http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3713769/web/Love/Chromatic%20Paths/screenie1.png)
![Image](http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3713769/web/Love/Chromatic%20Paths/screenie2.png)
Thanks for making it!Victory! Thank you for playing:
Yeah, that's a game over. I couldn't think of a decent way off the top of my head to check for situations like that.T-Bone wrote:You sometimes get trapped with no way to reset as far as I know.
Technically speaking, /none/ of the triangles have bases. They used to, but it didn't look as good - this way breaks up the grid a bit, which is easier on the eyes.pancakepalace wrote:For clarity, I would not remove the base of triangles that in opposite directions. It makes it look like there is something special about those triangles when there isn't. All triangles should have a base.
It is still really confusing, though.Taehl wrote:Technically speaking, /none/ of the triangles have bases. They used to, but it didn't look as good - this way breaks up the grid a bit, which is easier on the eyes.
It's not important for the user what is happening on a technical level, what matters is what he sees.Taehl wrote:Technically speaking, /none/ of the triangles have bases. They used to, but it didn't look as good - this way breaks up the grid a bit, which is easier on the eyes.
Users browsing this forum: Hugues Ross and 1 guest